Differentiating confidence in the police, trust in the police, and satisfaction with the police

Author:

Cao Liqun

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to differentiate clearly between three frequently used concepts found in the research literature on public perceptions of the police: confidence in the police, satisfaction with the police and trust in the police. Design/methodology/approach – Systemic literature review and thematic analysis are employed to assess each key term in the official English language dictionary and in the research literature. Their individual origins, their evolvement and their current usages are examined with great care. Findings – The findings of the study suggest that the three phrases are indeed distinct in their connotation. It is concluded that “confidence in the police” is the preferred choice when we survey the citizenry about the level of support for the police and when the police is evaluated as a political institution. Practical implications – Given that most criminologists believe that we are doing scientific research, it is our duty to be attentive to the pitfalls of lack of conceptual clarity. Originality/value – The essay advances the conceptual clarification of one of the popular themes in the study of the police.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Public Administration,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference70 articles.

1. Barber, B. (1983), The Logic and Limit of Trust , Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.

2. Bellah, R.N. , Madsen, R. , Sullivan, W.M. , Swidler, A. and Tipton, S.M. (1992), The Good Society , Vintage Books, New York, NY.

3. Bourdieu, P. (1991), Language and Symbolic Power , Polity, Cambridge.

4. Brandl, S. , Frank, J. , Worden, R.E. and Bynum, T.S. (1994), “Global and specific attitudes toward the police: disentangling the relationship”, Justice Quarterly , Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 119-134.

5. Brodeur, J.-P. (1983), “High policing and low policing: remarks about the policing of political activities”, Social Problems , Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 507-520.

Cited by 76 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3