Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to provide a comparison of job satisfaction levels between countries of Western and Eastern Europe by first examining the extent of difference between the two sets of countries and then explaining these differences in terms of differences in job characteristics between the countries.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology employed is to use the estimates from an ordered logit model to decompose the probability of being at a particular level of satisfaction into its “attributes” and “coefficients” parts. The empirical foundation for the study is provided by data for over 20,000 employed respondents, pertaining to the year 2000, obtained from the 1999‐2002 Values Survey Integrated Data File.FindingsCompared to East European countries, job satisfaction levels were considerably higher in West European countries. Moreover, there was considerably greater inequality in the distribution of job satisfaction in East European, compared to West European, countries. Job satisfaction depended critically on the constellation of job‐related attributes that employees regarded as being “important”. The greater the weight that one placed on the external aspects of a job – pay, holidays, promotion chances etc. – the more likely one was to be dissatisfied. The greater the weight one placed on the internal aspects of a job – responsibility, usefulness, social interaction – the more likely one was to be satisfied.Practical implicationsThe methodology and conclusions will be useful to labour economists and to human resource managers.Originality/valueThe reason that West European countries have higher levels of job satisfaction, compared to East European countries could, in part, be because they are better endowed with the “attributes” that promote job satisfaction; it could also, in part, be due to the “coefficient responses” of workers in West European countries, to a given set of attributes, being more conducive to job satisfaction than the corresponding responses of workers in East European countries. This paper estimates the relative importance of attributes and coefficients in determining differences in levels of job satisfaction between the two sets of countries.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management
Reference43 articles.
1. Anand, S. and Sen, A. (1997), Concepts of Human Development and Poverty: A Multidimensional Perspective, Human Development Report 1997 Papers, UNDP, New York, NY.
2. Atkinson, A.B. (1970), “On the measurement of inequality”, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 2, pp. 244‐63.
3. Bellamy, S., Morley, C. and Watty, K. (2003), “Why British academics remain in Australia despite deteriorating work conditions and reduced job satisfaction: an intellectual puzzle”, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol. 25, pp. 13‐28.
4. Bellfield, C.R. and Harris, R.D.F. (2002), “How well do theories of job matching explain variations in job satisfaction across education levels?”, Applied Economics, Vol. 34, pp. 535‐48.
5. Bender, K.A., Donohue, S.M. and Heywood, J.S. (2005), “Job satisfaction and gender segregation”, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 57, pp. 479‐96.
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献