Abstract
PurposeThe current study aims to investigate the mediating role of executive stock options in the nonlinear relationship between financial constraints and research and development (R&D) investment through two measures of financial constraints.Design/methodology/approachThis study is based on a sample of 90 French firms for the period extending from 2008 to 2020. The authors employ a panel threshold method to analyze whether the impact of financial constraints on R&D investment depends on the level of financial constraints or not.FindingsUsing SA index (Hadlock and Pierce, 2010) and FCP index (Schauer et al., 2019) as measures of financial constraints, the authors demonstrate that the relationship between financial constraints and R&D investment is nonlinear. Moreover, the authors find that executive stock options mediate partially the relationship between financial constraints and R&D investment. More specifically, the authors show that stock options could play two roles depending on the level of the financial constraints; inconsistent mediation for firms with low/medium level of financial constraints and partial mediation for highly constrained firms.Originality/valueThis paper is the first to the best of the authors' knowledge to investigate the nonlinear relationship between financial constraints and R&D investment as well as the mediating role of executive stock option using dynamic panel threshold models.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference37 articles.
1. Creativity and innovation under constraints: a cross-disciplinary integrative review;Journal of Management,2019
2. CEO incentive compensation and risk-taking behavior: the moderating role of CEO characteristics;Academy of Strategic Management Journal,2018
3. The ethics of managerial compensation: the case of executive stock options;Journal of Business Ethics,2008
4. Employee stock options and investment;Journal of Finance,2011
5. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986