Author:
Musiał-Karg Magdalena,Kapsa Izabela
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to discuss reasons for the failure of the 2020 postal-vote election reform in Poland and examine opinions of Poles on voting methods. The main goal is to answer the following research question: Which of the alternative voting methods – postal or electronic – would Poles prefer?
Design/methodology/approach
The approach is quantitative and based on the statistical analysis of voters’ attitudes toward alternative voting methods, in particular postal voting.
Findings
The main finding is that out of all voting methods available, most Poles favor electronic voting as a potential alternative to voting in person. On a general level, the conclusions from the Polish case highlight the need to establish special requirements and standards for democratic elections during emergency situations. The unsuccessful implementation of all-postal voting in Poland is an example of how changes to the law should not be made, especially when public health and democratic standards are at stake.
Practical implications
The paper presents practical implications and recommendations for state authorities and electoral administration while implementing electoral reforms, extending the list of available voting channels, and running elections – especially in extraordinary situations.
Originality/value
This paper adds to the knowledge on alternative voting channels, including their implementation during a pandemic. The Polish case is also relevant for other countries as regards safe and democratic elections during emergency situations. Policymakers are expected to benefit from the insight, as the results originate in public opinion polls and identify voting channels favored by citizens
Subject
Information Systems and Management,Computer Science Applications,Public Administration
Reference45 articles.
1. E-voting adoption in a developing country;Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy,2016
2. Voting technology, vote-by-mail, and residual votes in California, 1990-2010;Political Research Quarterly,2012
3. A theory of participatory democracy based on the real case of Porto Alegre;European Economic Review,2009
4. Politics by principle, not interest,1998
5. CBOS (2015), “Wiedza o ułatwieniach przed wyborami prezydenckimi”, Komunikat z badań No. 61, available at: www.rpo.gov.pl/sites/default/files/Komunikat%20CBOS%20-%20Wiedza%20o%20u%C5%82atwieniach%20w%20g%C5%82osowaniu%20przed%20wyborami%20prezydenckimi.pdf (accessed 20 May 2020).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Die unbeachtete Wahlrevolution;Die Bundestagswahl 2021;2023
2. Die unbeachtete Wahlrevolution;Die Bundestagswahl 2021;2022