Postal or electronic voting? The analysis of the preferred voting methods in the context of failed electoral reform in Poland

Author:

Musiał-Karg Magdalena,Kapsa Izabela

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to discuss reasons for the failure of the 2020 postal-vote election reform in Poland and examine opinions of Poles on voting methods. The main goal is to answer the following research question: Which of the alternative voting methods – postal or electronic – would Poles prefer? Design/methodology/approach The approach is quantitative and based on the statistical analysis of voters’ attitudes toward alternative voting methods, in particular postal voting. Findings The main finding is that out of all voting methods available, most Poles favor electronic voting as a potential alternative to voting in person. On a general level, the conclusions from the Polish case highlight the need to establish special requirements and standards for democratic elections during emergency situations. The unsuccessful implementation of all-postal voting in Poland is an example of how changes to the law should not be made, especially when public health and democratic standards are at stake. Practical implications The paper presents practical implications and recommendations for state authorities and electoral administration while implementing electoral reforms, extending the list of available voting channels, and running elections – especially in extraordinary situations. Originality/value This paper adds to the knowledge on alternative voting channels, including their implementation during a pandemic. The Polish case is also relevant for other countries as regards safe and democratic elections during emergency situations. Policymakers are expected to benefit from the insight, as the results originate in public opinion polls and identify voting channels favored by citizens

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Information Systems and Management,Computer Science Applications,Public Administration

Reference45 articles.

1. E-voting adoption in a developing country;Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy,2016

2. Voting technology, vote-by-mail, and residual votes in California, 1990-2010;Political Research Quarterly,2012

3. A theory of participatory democracy based on the real case of Porto Alegre;European Economic Review,2009

4. Politics by principle, not interest,1998

5. CBOS (2015), “Wiedza o ułatwieniach przed wyborami prezydenckimi”, Komunikat z badań No. 61, available at: www.rpo.gov.pl/sites/default/files/Komunikat%20CBOS%20-%20Wiedza%20o%20u%C5%82atwieniach%20w%20g%C5%82osowaniu%20przed%20wyborami%20prezydenckimi.pdf (accessed 20 May 2020).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Die unbeachtete Wahlrevolution;Die Bundestagswahl 2021;2023

2. Die unbeachtete Wahlrevolution;Die Bundestagswahl 2021;2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3