On the management success of regulative failure: standardised CSR instruments and the oil industry's climate performance

Author:

Lerum Boasson Elin

Abstract

PurposeCorporate social responsibility (CSR) may serve as a regulatory framework for corporate practices or as a management trend that helps to improve the legitimacy of corporations. This article explores whether and how petroleum corporations' adherence to standardised CSR instruments has influenced how they deal with climate change.Design/methodology/approachComparative case study of Hydro and Shell based on assessments of central documents, publications on CSR and interviews with corporate representatives.FindingsThe management trend mode of CSR has prevailed within both companies. Company conduct is deeply influenced by the global petroleum field, but it mainly promotes CSR as legitimacy enhancer and hinders the instruments in working as regulative frameworks. Hydro executives have no aim of applying the CSR instruments to guide their actions. Executives at Shell have tried, but without being fully able to get the vast Shell group to adapt. Thus far, the failure of CSR as a regulative framework seems to contribute to its success as legitimacy enhancing concept. Nonetheless, it is not clear whether the two trends will continue to contrast or if they may start to work in conjunction.Research limitations/implicationsDue to the global organisational span of such corporations, CSR research may gain from focussing specifically on institutionalisation processes at the level of their global organisational field.Practical implicationsThe negative trade‐off between CSR as legitimacy enhancer and as a regulative framework may represent a core concern for CSR practitioners. Further, the findings indicate that it may prove more fruitful to develop CSR instruments within specific organisational fields than to focus on holistic instruments.Originality/valueThe framework applied tracks micro‐effects of the instruments and provides insights into the relative importance of company‐internal and ‐external factors. This may prove fruitful for CSR research directed at other business and social concerns.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference56 articles.

1. Boasson, E.L. (2005), “Klimaskapte beslutningsendringer?”, Master's thesis, Department of Political Science, University of Oslo.

2. Boasson, E.L., Wettestad, J. and Bohn, M. (2006), CSR in the European Oil Sector, FNI Report 9/2006, Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Lysaker, Norway.

3. Bonn, I. and Fisher, J. (2005), “Corporate governance and business ethics”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 730‐8.

4. Brunsson, N. (1993), “Ideas and actions”, Accounting Organizations and Society, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 489‐506.

5. Byrkjeflot, H. (2002), “The Americanisation of Swedish and Norwegian Management”, in Kipping, M. and Toratsoo, N. (Eds), Americanisation in 20th‐Century Europe, Rokkan Centre, Bergen, Norway, offprint 4.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3