Author:
Tong Yew Kwan,Arvey Richard D
Abstract
Purpose
– While advancements in theory have helped illumine the complex workings of today’s organization, little is said on the practical implications for managers in terms of their role and behavioral style. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how a behavioral diagnostic tool – the Competing Values Framework (CVF; Quinn and Rohrbaugh, 1983) – can be utilized to develop managers in the behavioral skills needed to stay relevant and effective amid new organizational realities.
Design/methodology/approach
– The conceptual anchor of this paper is in complexity theory. The authors conducted a literature search for articles on complexity theory in selective management journals, and reviewed them to extract key lessons for effective managerial behavior.
Findings
– Three behaviors found to be central to managing complexity were: enabling, sensemaking, and facilitating shared leadership. It is suggested that the CVF is a useful tool for helping managers develop their behavioral repertoire and hence their skills for enacting these behaviors.
Originality/value
– The paper synthesizes a guiding frame for developing managers in some of the behavioral skills needed to handle complexity at the workplace. Toward this end, useful tips are offered for putting together a short training workshop where the CVF is rediscovered as a unique developmental tool.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Reference81 articles.
1. Amagoh, F.
(2008), “Perspectives on organizational change: systems and complexity theories”,
The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal
, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 1-14.
2. Anderson, P.
(1999), “Perspective: complexity theory and organization science”,
Organization Science
, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 216-232.
3. Andriole, S.J.
(2010), “Business impact of Web 2.0 technologies”,
Communications of the ACM
, Vol. 53 No. 12, pp. 67-79.
4. Arsenault, P.
and
Faerman, S.R.
(2014), “Embracing paradox in management: the value of the competing values framework”,
Organization Management Journal
, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 147-158.
5. Belasen, A.
and
Frank, N.
(2008), “Competing values leadership: quadrant roles and personality traits”,
Leadership & Organization Development Journal
, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 127-143.
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献