Evaluating the effects of blacklisting on residential property prices in Hong Kong

Author:

Yau Yung

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to empirically examine whether public knowledge of poor conditions of multi‐storey residential buildings affected the sale prices of these properties based on an analysis of panel data in Hong Kong.Design/methodology/approachPrevious studies suggested that physical conditions of residential properties, particularly those concerning communal areas and services, might not be fully priced by the market because of the problem of information asymmetry. Therefore, it was envisaged that additional information pumped into the housing market could alter the price gradient between high‐quality and low‐quality properties. In November 2000, the Hong Kong Government publicly announced a list of poorly‐performing buildings, and this study aims to examine whether the blacklisting exercise brought about negative impacts on the sale prices of the affected properties. Hedonic price analysis was conducted on a set of panel data which consists of property transactions in both blacklisted and non‐blacklisted buildings.FindingsThe analysis results showed that properties in blacklisted buildings were not transacted at a discount, compared with those in non‐blacklisted buildings before the blacklisting exercise. Also, the release of public information on the blacklist did not create a relative diminution of the property prices of the blacklisted buildings.Research limitations/implicationsThin property transactions in derelict buildings limited the number of observations for running the regression analysis.Practical implicationsThe piecemeal blacklisting exercise could not create price differential in the housing market, and thus it was not possible for the Hong Kong Government to lure homeowners to invest in their properties by market forces. The government should consider the implementation of a territory‐wide building classification scheme or other alternatives to solve the problems of building disrepair.Originality/valueThis study is the first attempt to empirically investigate the value diminution effects of the government's blacklisting against dilapidation buildings.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference40 articles.

1. Akerlof, G.A. (1970), “The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84 No. 3, pp. 488‐500.

2. Arens, S.B. (1997), “The valuation of defective properties: a common sense approach”, The Appraisal Journal, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 143‐8.

3. Arnott, R.J., Davidson, R. and Pines, D. (1983), “Housing quality, maintenance and rehabilitation”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 50 No. 3, pp. 467‐94.

4. Bourassa, S.C. and Peng, V.S. (1999), “Hedonic prices and house numbers: the information of feng shui”, International Real Estate Review, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 79‐93.

5. Bröchner, J. (2002), “Building economics and facilities management: knowledge and incentives”, Proceedings of the 10th International CIB W65 and W55 Symposium, 9‐13 September, Cincinnati, OH, pp. 5‐8.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3