Extending differences-in-differences frameworks to Granger equations: evidence from cutback management during three recessions

Author:

Buerger ChristianORCID,Sandel Riley M.ORCID,Reitano VincentORCID,Lofton Michelle L.ORCID,Jones Peter

Abstract

PurposeThe authors show how to extend difference-in-differences (DiD) frameworks to Granger (1969) equations, a technique that tests for the parallel trends assumption and measures changes in effect sizes over time. To illustrate how these equations work, they apply them to state cutback management decisions in three recessions.Design/methodology/approachThis study applies quantitative methods. The authors estimate DiD frameworks as Granger (1969) equations.FindingsAfter empirically analyzing recessions that started in 1990, 2001 and 2007, the authors find that states deepen expenditure cuts when economic declines lengthen and tend to make large cuts to specific expenditure categories instead of spreading cuts equally over all service areas.Originality/valueThe authors offer two contributions of methodological value. First, they introduce the estimation of Granger equations to the study of topics in public administration. Second, they show how this technique helps to evaluate the impact of economic declines on state spending. By instituting these contributions, they offer a unique way of analyzing cutback management decisions.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference55 articles.

1. Angrist, J.D. (2010), “Treatment effect”, in Durlauf, S.N. and Blume, L.E. (Eds), Microeconometrics: The New Palgrave Economics Collection, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

2. The state of applied econometrics: causality and policy evaluation;Journal of Economic Perspectives,2017

3. Outsourcing at will: the contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing;Journal of Labor Economics,2003

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3