Political entrepreneurship in action research: learning from two cases

Author:

Björkman Hans,Sundgren Mats

Abstract

PurposeTo discuss political entrepreneurship as a capability to enable durable insider action research projects.Design/methodology/approachThe two authors utilize auto‐ethnographic methods in order to evaluate and draw inferences from their own actions as insider action researchers. The paper draws on action research theory and theories on political entrepreneurship.FindingsPolitical entrepreneurship is an important factor behind success or failure in action research projects, but has, despite this, been scarcely discussed in the action research literature. Findings indicate that a political entrepreneurship repertoire consisting of capabilities to find red‐hot issues for one's research, to use the inside of the organization in the research efforts, to use and diffuse the research results, and, finally, to work on the positioning of one's relational platform.Research limitations/implicationsThe study is based upon case studies in two organizations. Its implications may be further developed through studies in a wider array of settings.Practical implicationsThe study provides valuable knowledge for organizations intending to participate in (insider) action research as well as for (insider) action researchers.Originality/valuePolitical entrepreneurship in action research is scarcely discussed in action research theory – and hence the paper addresses an important research gap. Moreover, the presented implications have a certain practical value for organizations and researchers.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences

Reference53 articles.

1. Adler, P.A. and Adler, P. (1994), “Observational techniques”, in Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 377‐92.

2. Alvesson, M. (1999), Methodology for Close up Studies – Struggling with Closeness and Closure, Institute of Economic Research Working Paper Series, Lund.

3. Argyris, C. (1982), Reasoning, Learning and Action, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.

4. Argyris, C. (1993), Knowledge for Action, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.

5. Argyris, C., Putnam, R. and Smith, D. (1985), Action Science, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Becoming a Collaborative Scholar: A Metalogue;Journal of Management Inquiry;2024-04-30

2. The role of the mindsets of small business owners in using business consulting services;Journal of the International Council for Small Business;2022-04-19

3. How Could Antecedents to Project Collaborative Effectiveness Through Project War-Room Meetings, Develop Cohesion in Multicultural Teams: While Problem-Solving?;2020 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM);2020-12-14

4. Policy entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial orientation in vulnerable Swedish municipalities;Entrepreneurship & Regional Development;2020-08-06

5. Aligning regional and business strategies: Looking inside the Basque Country entrepreneurial innovation ecosystem;Thunderbird International Business Review;2020-06-23

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3