Abstract
PurposeThe authors explore how social approval assets, namely status and reputation, are used to legitimate and categorise a new national university. They argue that in the course of the legitimation process, status and reputation work as stakeholder-oriented value-creating benefits. The authors specifically analyse the discursive constructions and labels used in the process and how the process enables nationwide university reform.Design/methodology/approachThe authors’ longitudinal case study utilises critical discourse analysis and analyses media and policy discourses regarding the birth of Aalto University.FindingsThe findings suggest that the legitimation of the new university was accomplished through the use of two distinct discourses: one on higher education and another on the market economy. These discourses not only sought to legitimise the new university as categorically different from existing Finnish universities, but also rationalised the merger using the expected reputation and status benefits that were claimed would accrue for supporters.Practical implicationsThis study elaborates on the role of various social approval assets and labels in legitimation processes and explores how policy enforcement can take place in arenas that are not necessarily perceived as policymaking. For managers, it is crucial to understand how a chosen label (name) can result in both stakeholder support and resistance, and how important it is to anticipate the changes a label can invoke.Originality/valueThe authors propose that the use of several labels regarding a new organisation is strategically beneficial to attracting multiple audiences who may hold conflicting interests in terms of what the organisation and its offerings should embody. They propose that even though status and reputation have traditionally been defined as possessions of an organisation, they should be further understood as concepts used to disseminate and justify the interests, norms, structures and values in a stakeholder network.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Marketing,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Business and International Management
Reference56 articles.
1. Alajoutsijärvi, K., Juusola, K. and Siltaoja, M. (2013), “Academic capitalism hits the fan: the birth of acamanic capitalism”, in Malin, V., Murphy, J. and Siltaoja, M. (Eds), Dialogues in Critical Management Studies. Getting Things Done, Emerald Group Publishing, Vol. 2, pp. 91-121.
2. Struggles in organizational attempts to adopt new branding logics: the case of a marketizing university;Consumption, Markets and Culture,2014
3. Becoming ‘world-class?' Reputation-building in a university merger;Critical Perspectives on International Business,2011
4. The university branding game: players, interests, politics;International Studies of Management and Organization,2015
5. Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: the case of legitimacy, reputation, and status;Academy of Management Review,2011
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献