Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to provide an evaluation of public sector research in the 1998–2018 period.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper uses the extant literature of this era to study the theorisation of, and the findings of, public sector research.
Findings
This is a vibrant field of a study in a wide range of study settings and with many interdisciplinary studies. The influence of new public management is pervasive over this period. There are numerous instances of innovations in study settings, in key findings and the approach taken by investigators.
Research limitations/implications
This is not a comprehensive review of all literature in this period.
Practical implications
This study also explored the relevance of academic research of this era to policymaking by governments.
Originality/value
This paper offers a distinctive critique of theorisation of public sector accounting research. It reveals the dominant theoretical reference points in use during this period and observes the increasing tendency for theoretical pluralism to investigate complex study settings.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference282 articles.
1. Management fashion;Academy of Management Review,1996
2. Albritton, R. (1995), “Regulation theory: a critique”, in Albritton, R. and Sekine, T.T. (Eds), A Japanese Approach to Political Economy, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 201-226.
3. Actor–network theory, organizations and critique: towards a politics of organizing;Organization,2010
4. Some economics of property rights;Il Politico,1965
Cited by
80 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献