Abstract
PurposeThis paper analyzes the ways in which accounting enables operations managers to enter and perform multiple roles in their interplay with organizational groups on the shop floor and in management, and the associated negotiations that operations managers have with “the self.”Design/methodology/approachUsing field-based studies in a mining organization, the study draws on Goffman’s backstage–frontstage metaphor to analyze how operations managers enter and perform several roles with the aid of accounting.FindingsThe findings show that accounting legitimizes operations managers when they cross organizational boundaries, as accounting gives them an “entry ticket” that legitimizes their presence with the group. Accounting further allows operations managers to embrace more than one role by “putting on a mask” to become an outsider or insider in relation to a group. In performing their roles, operations managers exhibit varying attributes and knowledge. Accounting can thereby be withheld from, or shared with, organizational groups. The illusion of accounting as deterministic presented frontstage is not necessarily negotiated that way backstage. Rather, alternatives discussed backstage often become silenced in the frontstage performance. The study concludes that operations managers cross boundaries, embrace roles and exert agency as they navigate with accounting, enrolling it into their performance simultaneously as they backstage reflect upon accounting and its role for their everyday work.Originality/valueThis study relies on the frontstage/backstage metaphor to visualize the discrepancies in how accounting is enrolled into role performances and how seemingly categorical fronts do not necessarily share that dominant position backstage.
Reference51 articles.
1. On the (re) construction of numbers and operational reality: a study of face-to-face interactions;Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management,2016
2. Organizational identity and management accounting change;Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,2011
3. Ahrens, T. (1996), “Financial and operational modes of accountability: differing accounts of British and German managers”, in Munro, R. and Mouritsen, J. (Eds), Accountability: Power, Ethos and the Technologies of Managing, International Thomson Business Press, London.
4. Talking accounting: an ethnography of management knowledge in British and German brewers;Accounting, Organizations and Society,1997
5. The structuration of legitimate performance measures and management: day-to-day contests of accountability in a UK restaurant chain;Management Accounting Research,2002