Accounting talks – how operations managers nuance their frontstage performance with backstage negotiations

Author:

Curry AmandaORCID

Abstract

PurposeThis paper analyzes the ways in which accounting enables operations managers to enter and perform multiple roles in their interplay with organizational groups on the shop floor and in management, and the associated negotiations that operations managers have with “the self.”Design/methodology/approachUsing field-based studies in a mining organization, the study draws on Goffman’s backstage–frontstage metaphor to analyze how operations managers enter and perform several roles with the aid of accounting.FindingsThe findings show that accounting legitimizes operations managers when they cross organizational boundaries, as accounting gives them an “entry ticket” that legitimizes their presence with the group. Accounting further allows operations managers to embrace more than one role by “putting on a mask” to become an outsider or insider in relation to a group. In performing their roles, operations managers exhibit varying attributes and knowledge. Accounting can thereby be withheld from, or shared with, organizational groups. The illusion of accounting as deterministic presented frontstage is not necessarily negotiated that way backstage. Rather, alternatives discussed backstage often become silenced in the frontstage performance. The study concludes that operations managers cross boundaries, embrace roles and exert agency as they navigate with accounting, enrolling it into their performance simultaneously as they backstage reflect upon accounting and its role for their everyday work.Originality/valueThis study relies on the frontstage/backstage metaphor to visualize the discrepancies in how accounting is enrolled into role performances and how seemingly categorical fronts do not necessarily share that dominant position backstage.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference51 articles.

1. On the (re) construction of numbers and operational reality: a study of face-to-face interactions;Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management,2016

2. Organizational identity and management accounting change;Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,2011

3. Ahrens, T. (1996), “Financial and operational modes of accountability: differing accounts of British and German managers”, in Munro, R. and Mouritsen, J. (Eds), Accountability: Power, Ethos and the Technologies of Managing, International Thomson Business Press, London.

4. Talking accounting: an ethnography of management knowledge in British and German brewers;Accounting, Organizations and Society,1997

5. The structuration of legitimate performance measures and management: day-to-day contests of accountability in a UK restaurant chain;Management Accounting Research,2002

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3