Service user involvement in health professional education: is it effective in promoting recovery-oriented practice?

Author:

Arblaster Karen,Mackenzie Lynette,Willis Karen

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to evaluate how mental health service user involvement in health professional education adds value to student learning about recovery-oriented practice and to determine the quality and suitability of instruments used in studies to evaluate this involvement in terms of their: relationship to recovery-oriented practice; and psychometric properties. Design/methodology/approach – Studies of service user involvement were reviewed to identify their research objectives. These were mapped against an Australian recovery-oriented practice capability framework together with the constructs measured by instruments used in these studies. Psychometric properties for each instrument were evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. Findings – While research objectives are not stated in terms of recovery-oriented practice, they do relate to some elements of a recovery-oriented practice framework. No instrument measures outcomes against all recovery-oriented practice domains. The AQ has the strongest evidence for its psychometric properties. The most commonly used instrument measures only stigma and has poorly validated psychometric properties. Originality/value – This paper demonstrates that the “value add” of service user involvement in health professional education has been poorly defined and measured to date. Learning from lived experience is central to a recovery-orientation and is an expectation of health professional education programmes. Defining objectives for service user involvement in terms of recovery-oriented practice and developing an instrument which measures student learning against these objectives are important areas for ongoing research supporting improved approaches to supporting people’s recovery.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Health Policy,Education,Phychiatric Mental Health,Health(social science)

Reference60 articles.

1. Angermeyer, M.C. , Beck, M. and Matschinger, H. (2003), “Determinants of the public’s preference for social distance from people with schizophrenia”, Canadian Journal of Psychiatry , Vol. 48 No. 10, pp. 663-8.

2. Anthony, W.A. (1993), “Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s”, Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal , Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 11-23.

3. Arblaster, K. , Mackenzie, L. and Willis, K. (2015), “Mental health consumer participation in education: a structured literature review”, Australian Occupational Therapy Journal . doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12205.

4. Arikan, K. (2005), “A stigmatising attitude towards psychiatric illnesses is associated with narcissistic personality traits”, The Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences , Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 248-50.

5. Australian Association of Social Workers (2012), “Australian social work education and accreditation standards”, Australian Association of Social Workers, Canberra, available at: www.aasw.asn.au/document/item/100 (accessed 13 December 2013).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3