How do forensic inpatients’ interpersonal sensitivity to dominance and perceptions of staff coercion impact upon anger and rates of aggression?

Author:

Holley Jessica,Tapp James,Draycott Simon

Abstract

Purpose Coercive practices – which are used as means to manage violent/aggressive behaviour in secure forensic settings – have come under scrutiny in recent years due to their paradoxical effects on provoking further service user aggression and violence. Previous research has found relationships between increased service user aggression with both service users’ interpersonal styles and perceptions of staff coercion (i.e. staff limit setting). This paper aims to investigate whether forensic service users’ levels of interpersonal sensitivity to dominance increase levels of self-reported anger and rates of aggression towards staff through perceptions of staff coercion. Design/methodology/approach In a cross-sectional quantitative study design, 70 service users were recruited from one high and two medium secure forensic hospitals. Standardised measures were completed by service users and recorded incident data was collected within the past year. Correlation and mediation analyses were run to investigate the relationship between study variables. Findings A significant relationship was found between service users’ interpersonal sensitivity to dominance and self-reported rates of anger, where forensic service users’ who had higher levels of interpersonal sensitivity to others’ dominance were likely to report higher rates of anger. No significant relationships were found between all other study variables. Practical implications The findings from this study contradict previous research where coercive practices may not necessarily increase rates of aggression towards staff but, in the context of service users’ interpersonal sensitivities to dominance, it may be more useful to consider the way in which coercive practices are implemented. Originality/value There is a gap in the literature, which looks at the way in which forensic service users perceive coercive practices in relation to their interpersonal sensitivities and whether this too has an impact upon service user aggression.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference58 articles.

1. American Psychiatric Association, American Psychiatric Nurses Association & National Association of Psychiatric Health Systems (2003), “Learning from each other: success stories and ideas for reducing restraint/seclusion in behavioural health”, available at: WorldCat_Website:_www.worldcat.org/title/learning-from-each-other-success-stories-and-ideas-for-reducing-restraintseclusion-in-behavioral-health/oclc/52758580

2. A ten‐year prospective study of aggression in a special secure unit for dangerous patients;Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,1999

3. Self-esteem and interpersonal functioning in psychiatric outpatients;Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,2009

4. Relationship of personality disorders to observer ratings of interpersonal style in forensic psychiatric patients;Journal of Personality Disorders,1998

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3