Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of the paper is to analyse the interactions of bridging users in Twitter discussions about vaccination.Design/methodology/approachConversational threads were collected through filtering the Twitter stream using keywords and the most active participants in the conversations. Following data collection and anonymisation of tweets and user profiles, a retweet network was created to find users bridging the main clusters. Four conversations were selected, ranging from 456 to 1,983 tweets long, and then analysed through content analysis.FindingsAlthough different opinions met in the discussions, a consensus was rarely built. Many sub-threads involved insults and criticism, and participants seemed not interested in shifting their positions. However, examples of reasoned discussions were also found.Originality/valueThe study analyses conversations on Twitter, which is rarely studied. The focus on the interactions of bridging users adds to the uniqueness of the paper.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference42 articles.
1. Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2018
2. Weaponized health communication: Twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate;American Journal of Public Health,2018
3. Political networks on Twitter;Information, Communication and Society,2013
4. Structural holes and good ideas;American Journal of Sociology,2004
5. Cossard, A., De Francisci, G. and Kalimeri, K. (2020), “Falling into the echo chamber: the Italian vaccination debate on Twitter”, arXiv, available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.11906 (accessed 13 August 2020).
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献