Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide a more expansive recounting of the process of fieldwork, taking place over a number of years in diverse locations, in order to show how research design develops through the process of field research, as well as to highlight the complexity of fieldwork, especially issues of access, identity, and power.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is based on the author's fieldwork experiences in Sierra Leone, working from and expanding upon fieldnotes from time in the field. Reflexive, autoethnographic personal narratives of fieldwork experiences are juxtaposed with theoretical writing about ethnographic observation and qualitative research.FindingsThe expansive discussion of the process of fieldwork and the development of the research project through time demonstrates and explicates the complexity and temporal dimensions of qualitative field research. Issues of access, identities, and power/privilege are also crucial aspects of the fieldwork process.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper shows the importance of acknowledging and articulating the development of fieldwork and research design over time and in different places. It also discusses the complexity of fieldwork due to issues of access, identity, and power. Its claims are limited by its focus on one case, the author's fieldwork.Social implicationsThis piece will help members of society better understand the process of qualitative fieldwork. Given its format and writing style, this piece can be easily read and understood by interested members of the public.Originality/valueThis paper provides narratives and commentary that provide a more complete picture of the practice of field research and the development of research design over the course of time and in diverse locations. This will be valuable to researchers, especially those preparing for field experiences for the first time or for their first time in a particular field, as well as students interested in learning about qualitative fieldwork practices.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Reference42 articles.
1. Aggarwal, R. (2000), “Traversing lines of control: feminist anthropology today”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 571 No. 1, pp. 14‐29.
2. Alvesson, M. and Sköldberg, K. (2000), Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research, Sage, London.
3. Alvesson, M., Hardy, C. and Harley, B. (2008), “Reflecting on reflexivity: reflexive textual practices in organization and management theory”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 480‐501.
4. Behar, R. (1996), The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology that Breaks Your Heart, Beacon Press, Boston, MA.
5. Buzard, J. (2003), “On auto‐ethnographic authority”, The Yale Journal of Criticism, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 1‐91.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献