Abstract
In September 2000, Amazon.com attempted to implement a differential pricing structure that would track online purchasing behaviors to charge loyal customers higher prices for the same product. Amazon’s customers met this new pricing initiative with extreme displeasure, forcing the company to end its trial with differential pricing. Differential pricing is not new. Industries such as travel and retail have charged consumers different prices for years through special promotions such as frequent flyer miles and loyal customer discount cards. Why is it then that Amazon’s customers perceived the company’s differential pricing structure as being unfair? More importantly, are there times when such pricing is acceptable? An understanding of the concepts of distributive and procedural justice, as well as equity theory and dual entitlement, provides managers with the defining principles of price fairness. Implementing these concepts and theories into the firm’s pricing practices will increase the likelihood that customers will perceive differential pricing as being fair.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Marketing
Reference23 articles.
1. Adamy, J. (2000), “E‐tailer price tailoring may be wave of future”, Chicago Tribune, Section 4, 25 September, p. 4.
2. Campbell, M.C. (1999), “Perceptions of price unfairness: antecedents and consequences,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 36, May, pp. 187‐99.
3. Dickson, P.R. and Kalapurakal, R. (1994), “The use and perceived fairness of price‐setting rules in the bulk electricity market,” Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 15, pp. 427‐48.
4. Galston, W. (1980), Justice and the Human Good, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
5. Haddock, D.D. and McChesney, F.S. (1994), “Why do firms contrive shortages? The economics of intentional mispricing”, Economic Inquiry, Vol. 32, October, pp. 562‐81.
Cited by
74 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献