Author:
Halbesleben Jonathon R.B.,Wheeler Anthony R.,Buckley M. Ronald
Abstract
PurposePluralistic ignorance is defined as a situation in which an individual holds an opinion, but mistakenly believes that the majority of his or her peers hold the opposite opinion. The purpose of this paper is to refocus attention on pluralistic ignorance as an important, applied, and multilevel concept to organizational researchers by developing a theory of pluralistic ignorance in organizational contexts.Design/methodology/approachThe paper reviews the literature with regard to the causes and consequences (for individuals, groups and organizations) of pluralistic ignorance and develops an integrated understanding of how pluralistic ignorance influences employees and organizations.FindingsThe paper finds that pluralistic ignorance is a complex phenomenon that has important consequences for organizations with relation to behavior of individuals.Research limitations/implicationsThe development of a model of pluralistic ignorance, with research propositions, will assist researchers seeking to conduct research on this topic.Originality/valueThis paper is original in that it is the first to delineate the processes underlying pluralistic ignorance in a managerial/organizational context.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Management Science and Operations Research,Applied Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference77 articles.
1. Allport, F.H. (1924), Social Psychology, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
2. Allport, F.H. (1933), Institutional Behavior, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
3. Asch, S.E. (1956), “Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority”, Psychological Monographs, Vol. 70, p. 70.
4. Ashforth, B.E. and Mael, F. (1989), “Social identity theory and the organization”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 20‐39.
5. Buckley, M.R., Harvey, M.G. and Beu, D.S. (2000), “The role of pluralistic ignorance in the perception of unethical behavior”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 353‐64.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献