Author:
Maehle Natalia,Iversen Nina,Hem Leif,Otnes Cele
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to identify the relative importance of four main attributes of food products for consumer’s choice. These are price, taste, environmental friendliness and healthfulness, tested across hedonic and utilitarian food products (milk and ice-cream). The weighting of attributes involved in food choices is a complex phenomenon, as consumers must consider contradictory requirements when making their choices. Consumers’ decision-making processes might also be influenced by food category. Some food products are mostly consumed for pleasure, whereas others are consumed because of their nutritional value.
Design/methodology/approach
– The study employs a choice-based conjoint technique, which addresses how consumers make trade-offs across a set of product attributes.
Findings
– The results indicate that price and taste attributes are rated as the most important for both hedonic and utilitarian food products. However, when the authors group consumers according to their product preferences, the relative importance of product attributes changes. Specifically, the importance of environmental friendliness and healthfulness is much higher among the health-conscious and environmentally conscious segments than for other segments.
Originality/value
– To the knowledge, this is the first study comparing the importance of this combination of product attributes (price, taste, calorie content and eco-label) across hedonic and utilitarian foods in a choice-based conjoint setting. Moreover, a new way of grouping consumers according to their ethical-value profiles enables the authors to create a psychographic description of these segments, and to relate it to their food attribute preferences.
Subject
Food Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference79 articles.
1. Anderson, J.C.
and
Gerbing, D.W.
(1988), “Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach”,
Psychological Bulletin
, Vol. 103 No. 3, pp. 411-423.
2. Anderson, W.T. Jr
and
Golden, L.L.
(1984), “Lifestyle and psychographics: a critical review and recommendation”,
Advances in Consumer Research
, Vol. 11, pp. 405-411.
3. Arbuthnot, J.
and
Lingg, S.
(1975), “A comparison of French and American environmental behaviors, knowledge, and attitudes”,
International Journal of Psychology
, Vol. 10
No. 4, pp. 275-281.
4. Auger, P.
and
Devinney, T.M.
(2007), “Do what consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions”,
Journal of Business Ethics
, Vol. 76 No. 4, pp. 361-383.
5. Auger, P.
,
Devinney, T.M.
,
Louviere, J.L.
and
Burke, P.F.
(2008), “Do social product features have value to consumers?”,
International Journal of Research in Marketing
, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 183-191.
Cited by
91 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献