Author:
Mensah Barbara Deladem,Abdul-Mumuni Abdallah
Abstract
Purpose
While several existing panel studies have focused on the linear specifications of the effect of remittances and financial development on carbon emissions, nonlinear panel studies on this subject remain thin on the ground. The purpose of this paper is to examine the asymmetric effect of remittances and financial development on carbon emissions in 31 selected sub-Saharan African countries for the period spanning from 1996 to 2018.
Design/methodology/approach
The Kao, Pedroni and Johansen–Fisher co-integration tests were conducted to ascertain a long-run relationship among the studied variables, whereas the nonlinear panel autoregressive distributed lag approach was applied to account for asymmetries.
Findings
The study revealed, among other things, that remittances and financial development asymmetrically influence carbon emissions in the selected panel of sub-Saharan African countries. In the long run, the positive shock in remittances on carbon emissions is greater than in the negative shock in remittances. Additionally, both positive and negative shocks in financial development mitigate carbon emissions.
Research limitations/implications
The implications of this study include the need to provide tax incentives to remitters and encourage them to invest in clean technologies so as to maintain sustainable development and low carbon emissions in the environment. There is also the need for governments and policymakers to formulate policies aimed at improving the functioning of the financial sectors in sub-Saharan Africa.
Originality/value
The positive and negative shocks of remittances and financial development on carbon emissions are examined to ascertain their asymmetric relationships.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Energy
Reference85 articles.
1. Remittances and child labour in Ghana: does the gender of the household head matter?;Development Southern Africa,2019
2. Modelling for insight: does financial development improve environmental quality?;Energy Economics,2019
3. Does financial development mitigate carbon emissions? Evidence from heterogeneous financial economies;Energy Economics,2020
4. Energy consumption, economic policy uncertainty and carbon emissions; causality evidence from resource rich economies;Economic Analysis and Policy,2020
5. Aglietta, M. and Espagne, É. (2016), “Climate and finance systemic risks, more than an analogy? The climate fragility hypothesis”, CEPII, Centre d’etudes prospectives et d’informations internationales.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献