Startup valuation reassessed: against celebrity, sustainability and state intervention

Author:

Hoffmann Christian Hugo

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to showcase that the valuation of startups is still considered to be more “art than science”. Moreover, such non-rigorous approaches often lead to valuations, which turn out to be too high, which in turn has become a well-known phenomenon to a broader audience due to shining examples such as We Work. This is reason enough to revisit the important topic of where we stand today with startup valuation procedures and methodologies. Design/methodology/approach Literature synthesis and exploratory analysis. Findings While some studies describe sound results about how to assess startups, what the authors found was that many questions remain open or have not been covered at all. This is the reason why the authors needed to apply a substantial amount of reasoning in the analysis of studies, which do not exactly deal with startup companies. The authors provided some interesting impulses for future research. Originality/value Based on an original overview of the current state of research about the valuation of startup companies, this paper makes the following principal contribution to both the literature and practice: on the one hand, the authors assess four impact factors on startup values critically; on the other, the authors provide an outlook on promising future research avenues.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference59 articles.

1. An axiomatic approach to the valuation of cash flows;Scandinavian Actuarial Journal,2014

2. Cross-country IPOs: what explains differences in underpricing?;Journal of Corporate Finance,2011

3. Corporate governance and investors’ perceptions of foreign ipo value: an institutional perspective?;Academy of Management Journal,2014

4. Exploring the differences in early-stage start-up valuation across countries: an institutional perspective;International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal,2020

5. Startup acquisitions, error costs, and antitrust policy;The University of Chicago Law Review,2020

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Examining the Pros and Cons of Incubators in Digital Entrepreneurship;Advances in Business Strategy and Competitive Advantage;2024-06-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3