An empirical investigation of the Baldrige framework using applicant scoring data

Author:

Mai FengORCID,Ford Matthew W.,Evans James R.

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to overcome evaluative limitations of previous studies to provide a more decisive test of the causal relationships implied in the Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence (CPE) using a unique data source. Design/methodology/approach The authors employ partial least squares path modeling on blinded scoring data from Baldrige Award applicants. In addition, the authors conduct multi-group analysis to examine whether the hypothesized causal model is universal across different industry sectors. Findings The path analysis provided strong support for the CPE framework in its entirety. However, analysis of sector-specific subsets of the data did not confirm all relationships, suggesting the possibility of industry-dependent performance excellence frameworks and raising new research questions to be explored. Practical implications This research offers several pertinent implications for managers who seek to translate the theoretical CPE framework to actionable quality-improvement efforts. Originality/value CPE operationalizes many total quality management (TQM) concepts and provides guidelines to TQM programs. This study validates the CPE framework using the most relevant data set to date – the applicant scoring data. The authors are also the first to investigate the cross-industry differences in the relationships between the CPE constructs.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference52 articles.

1. The Baldrige Education Criteria for Performance Excellence framework: empirical test and validation;International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management,2006

2. Bailey, D. (2014), “Boiling the ocean: how a manufacturer leveraged the criteria to improve its supply chain”, The Official Baldridge Blog, available at: https://nistbaldrige.blogs.govdelivery.com/2014/02/06/boiling-the-ocean-how-a-manufacturer-leveraged-the-criteria-to-improve-its-supply-chain/ (accessed September 15, 2017).

3. A conversation with Curt W. Reimann on the background and future of the Baldrige Award;Organizational Dynamics,1998

4. How do people use the Baldrige Award criteria?;Quality Progress,1995

5. An empirical assessment of the EFQM excellence model: evaluation as a TQM framework relative to the MBNQA model;Journal of Operations Management,2009

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3