A “DIRE” needs orientation to Saudi health services leadership

Author:

Mohammed Al‐Borie Hussein,Tanweer Abdullah Muhammad

Abstract

PurposeIn recent years, effective leadership initiatives have been emphasized in the healthcare industry all over the world. This paper aims to examine contemporary healthcare development in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and prescribe four essential policy dimensions to its leadership, depicting the imperative needs for direction, integration, revision, and evidence – the “DIRE needs” approach.Design/methodology/approachThe paper reviews literature on the contemporary KSA health system and provides guidelines for policy reforms vis‐à‐vis the emerging challenges.FindingsFirst, the paper offers a conceptual model to examine the ongoing and future health policy development of the KSA. It identifies four key policy dimensions – direction, integration, revision, and evidence and links these to the scope of broader health sector reforms. Second, it characterizes these dimensions as key initiatives for health resource capacity and infrastructural development, essentially the primary health care, which need to be taken up by KSA mainstream health services leadership. Third, it underlines the importance of integrating institutional research and information systems for evidence‐based policy‐making and practicable implementation. Fourth, it offers a social science research perspective to the need for multi‐dimensional health policy reforms in the KSA.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper opens up KSA health leadership initiatives that may be viewed as the DIRE needs, to be mainstreamed in the domains of policy and strategic planning, research and development, and healthcare management practices.Originality/valueSocial research in KSA health policy and planning is rare. This paper introduces a context‐specific multi‐dimensional model that provides critical insights into challenges and complexities that the Saudi health leadership must attend to. It defines a set of four essential benchmarking dimensions for guiding future policy reforms.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference42 articles.

1. Abdullah, M.T. (2000a), “Analysis of the challenging environment of inter‐agency collaboration for primary health care in Pakistan”, PhD thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster.

2. Abdullah, M.T. (2000b), “The regulation of private medical services in Pakistan: an issue pending attention by the state”, Journal of Law and Society, Vol. XXIII No. 36, pp. 39‐48.

3. Abdullah, M.T. and Abdullah, K.N. (2000), “What is medical social science? An analysis of its potential contributions to medical education in Pakistan”, Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. VIII Nos 1/2, pp. 111‐24.

4. Abdullah, M.T. and Shaw, J.E. (2007), “A review of the experience of public hospital autonomy in Pakistan”, International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 45‐62.

5. Al‐Borie, H.M. (2011), “Prioritizing insurance policy for health system reforms in the KSA: are we ‘putting the cart before the horse’?”, paper presented at The Future of Health Insurance in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Options and Prospects, Riyadh International Convention Centre, Riyadh, 10‐11 April.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3