The hierarchy of resource use for a sustainable circular economy

Author:

Nilsen Heidi RappORCID

Abstract

Purpose The original principles of the hierarchy of resource use seem to have been forgotten. The purpose of this paper is to address the necessity of these principles in order for a circular economy (CE) to be sustainable. Design/methodology/approach This is a general review paper explaining today’s shortcomings in a CE and in the waste hierarchy. Its theoretical contribution is illustrated using the example of marine plastic waste in the Arctic, as well as the EU’s action plan for a CE: “Closing the loop”. Findings There is a need to reduce raw materials into the economy directly and not only as a potential result of recycling. This is supported theoretically and by illustrating that the EU’s action plan is closing the loop primarily from the output side. Research limitations/implications The theoretical possibility of complete recycling rests on a premise that is now at odds with a sustainable development. Social implications The power of existing raw material production cycles must be challenged to allow reduction to be a real option. If not, a CE may exacerbate a moral trade-off by the current generation reducing the safe operating space of future living beings. Originality/value The theoretical possibility of recycling everything, also known as the technology-optimist view, has played the role of a safety net for humanity. As we are now exceeding planetary boundaries for a safe and just space for humanity, this theoretical safety net is no longer valid. Instead, we must reinforce the basic principles of the hierarchy of resource use.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Social Sciences,Economics and Econometrics

Reference63 articles.

1. AMAP (2015), “Summary for policy-makers: Arctic Pollution Issues 2015”, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Oslo, available at: www.amap.no/documents/doc/summary-for-policy-makers-arctic-pollution-issues-2015/1195 (accessed August 2018).

2. The second law, the forth law, recycling and limits to growth;Ecological Economics,1999

3. On the practical limits to substitution;Ecological Economics,2007

4. Bartl, A. (2015), “Circular economy: cycles, loops and cascades”, Report No. 2, Task Force on Resource Management, International Solid Waste Association, Vienna.

5. Baumgärtner, S. (2006), “Natural Science constraints in environmental and resource economics: method and problem”, University of Heidelberg Publications, Heidelberg, available at: http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/6593/1/Baumgaertner_NSCERE.pdf (accessed August 2019).

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3