The Thailand national AI ethics guideline: an analysis

Author:

Hongladarom Soraj

Abstract

Purpose The paper aims to analyze the content of the newly published National AI Ethics Guideline in Thailand. Thailand’s ongoing political struggles and transformation has made it a good case to see how a policy document such as a guideline in AI ethics becomes part of the transformations. Looking at how the two are interrelated will help illuminate the political and cultural dynamics of Thailand as well as how governance of ethics itself is conceptualized. Design/methodology/approach The author looks at the history of how the National AI Ethics Guidelines came to be and interprets its content, situating the Guideline within the contemporary history of the country as well as comparing the Guideline with some of the leading existing guidelines. Findings It is found that the Guideline represents an ambivalent and paradoxical nature that characterizes Thailand’s attempt at modernization. On the one hand, there is a desire to join the ranks of the more advanced economies, but, on the other hand, there is also a strong desire to maintain its own traditional values. Thailand has not been successful in resolving this tension yet, and this lack of success is shown in the way that content of the AI Ethics Guideline is presented. Practical implications The findings of the paper could be useful for further attempts in drafting and revising AI ethics guidelines in the future. Originality/value The paper represents the first attempt, so far as the author is aware, to analyze the content of the Thai AI Ethics Guideline critically.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy,Communication

Reference18 articles.

1. Uneven development, inequality and concentration of power: a critique of Thailand 4.0;Third World Quarterly,2019

2. Thailand 4.0 and the internal focus of nation branding;Asian Studies Review,2018

3. The logic of Thailand’s royalist coups d’etat,2020

4. High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (2019), “Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI”, European Commission, Brussels, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/ai-alliance-consultation.

5. Growing science from Thai soil: culture and development of scientific and technological capabilities in Thailand;Science, Technology and Society,2004

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Ethical implications of Thai ChatGPT public discourses;Communication Research and Practice;2024-06-06

2. Pronoun shifts in political discourse;Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation / Revista Internacional de Traducción;2024-04-02

3. Towards AI ethics-led sustainability frameworks and toolkits: Review and research agenda;Journal of Sustainable Finance and Accounting;2024-03

4. What ethics can say on artificial intelligence: Insights from a systematic literature review;Business and Society Review;2024-02-04

5. Societal and Ethical Implications of Technology in Education;2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON);2023-05-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3