Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to critically examine traditional approaches to paradoxes and propose a new approach and perspective that views “chiasmic” organizing as a intertwining combination of structure and processes that facilitate the handling of multiple interrelations for processing paradoxes and harness their creative potential in organizations.Design/methodology/approachEmploying a cross-disciplinary approach, a literature review and a critical lens, along with conceptual work (typology), are used to identify problems and deficiencies in existing research on paradoxes. Specifically, it draws on Merleau-Ponty's process-oriented phenomenology and post-Cartesian ontology to gain a comprehensive understanding of post-dualistic forms of chiasmic organizing and its relationship with paradoxical phenomena.FindingsThe process-oriented phenomenology and post-Cartesian ontology used in this article offer valuable insights and a critical approach to comprehend post-dualistic forms of chiasmic organizing in relation to paradoxes. This understanding can help in tapping into the energizing and creative potential of paradoxes. The paper also highlights the significance of the “in(ter)-between” as a reversible principle in chiasmic organizing and proposes some implications.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations and implications of this study are identified and discussed.Practical implicationsThe paper offers practical implications for organizations in processing paradoxes.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to the existing literature by providing a conceptual critique and proposing a novel understanding of chiasmic organizing as an intertwining structure and mediating processes by employing a process-oriented phenomenology and post-Cartesian ontology. It also offers innovative ways to approach paradoxes and tap into their creative potentials, which can bring about change in organizations.
Reference109 articles.
1. Rethinking stability and change in the study of organisational routines: difference and repetition in a newspaper-printing factory;Organisation Science,2016
2. ‘Culture for sale’: the effects of corporate colonization on the UK museum sector;Organisation Studies,2022
3. Functions of dysfunction: managing the dynamics of an organisational duality in a natural food cooperative;Administrative Science Quarterly,2014
4. Aust, I., Brandl, J., Keegan, A. and Lensges, M. (2017), “Tensions in managing human resources”, in Smith, W.K., Lewis, M.W., Jarzabkowski, P. and Langley, A. (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Organisational Paradox, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 413-433.
5. The paradoxes of just-in-time system;Management Research News,2022