A systematic investigation on the research publications that have used the medical expenditure panel survey (MEPS) data through a bibliometrics approach

Author:

Liu Jiacheng,Yu FeiORCID,Song Lixin

Abstract

PurposeThis study aimed to examine how Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data have been used to support scientific discoveries in biomedical and health sciences, and provide insight to researchers who are interested in using MEPS regarding collaborations and dissemination of research output.Design/methodology/approachA bibliometric approach was used to systematically examine the publications that used MEPS data and were indexed by PubMed and Web of Science (WoS). Microsoft Excel and bibliometric tools (WoS and VOSviewer) were utilized for quantitative and bibliometric network analysis. The measures were investigated on the total number of publications by year, research categories, source journals, other datasets/databases co-used with MEPS, funding sources, collaboration patterns, and research topics.FindingsA total of 1,953 eligible publications were included in this study with the numbers growing significantly over time. MEPS data were primarily used in healthcare services, public environmental and occupational health research. The journals that published the most papers using MEPS were all in the healthcare research area. Twenty-four other databases were found to be used along with MEPS. Over 3,200 researchers from 1,074 institutions in 25 countries have contributed to the publications. Research funding was supported from federal, private, local, and international agencies. Three clusters of research topics were identified among 235 key terms extracted from titles and abstracts.Originality/valueOur results illustrated the broad landscape of the research efforts that MEPS data have supported and substantiated the value of AHRQ's effort of providing MEPS to the public.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference64 articles.

1. Achenbach, J., Guarino, B., Kaplan, S. and Dennis, B. (2019), “Trump budget seeks cuts in science funding”, The Washington Post, 11 March, available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/2019/03/11/trump-budget-seeks-cuts-science-funding/ (accessed 15 September 2019).

2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, “U.S. Department of health and human services, about NGC and NQMC”, July 2018, available at: https://www.ahrq.gov/gam/about/index.html (accessed 16 September 2019).

3. Akst, J. (2019), “Trump releases 2020 budget proposal”, available at: https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/trump-releases-2020-budget-proposal-65587 (accessed 15 September 2019).

4. Mapping the field of knowledge management: bibliometric and content analysis of journal of information and knowledge management for the period from 2002–2016;Journal of Information and Knowledge Management,2018

5. Bibliometric analysis identifies publication trends and most common research topics related to internet health information seeking behaviour;Evidence Based Library and Information Practice,2015

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3