Author:
Ahiauzu Ndidi,Inko-Tariah Teingo
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to review the recent judgement of the Federal High Court exempting Nigerian lawyers from anti-money laundering (AML) obligations and to proffer suggestions as to ways of complying with international standards.
Design/methodology/approach
An analysis of the case and judgement was undertaken and a commentary on the effect of the obligations on lawyers was given. As a result of the analysis, suggestions were made to satisfy regulatory requirements while recognising the sanctity of the legal profession and the professional responsibilities members owe to their clients.
Findings
AML obligations are tasking and may impact negatively on rights of both lawyers and of their clients. However, with some measures taken by both regulators and lawyers, loopholes can be comfortably covered without leaving the legal sector exposed to criminal intents.
Research limitations/implications
There has not been any appeal on the case, and therefore the paper may not be conclusive.
Practical implications
Very relevant recommendations were made and, if taken up, may provide a meeting point for both parties and achieve the key purpose of detecting and/or preventing money laundering.
Originality/value
This is the first academic paper to analyse the current case and to provide relevant suggestions on the matter.
Subject
Law,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Public Administration
Reference4 articles.
1. Never to whistle-blow, JFBA’s approach: when to whistle-blow, a lawyer’s guide,2011
2. Rose, N. (2009), “Making the case for appropriate anti-money laundering rules for lawyers”, IBA News, April, pp. 37-39, available at: www.anti-moneylaundering.org/AMLResources.aspx (accessed 2 September 2015).
3. Testing the limits of solicitor-client privilege: lawyers, money laundering, and suspicious transaction reporting;Journal of Money Laundering Control,2006
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献