A systems‐based dynamic knowledge transfer capacity model

Author:

Parent Robert,Roy Mario,St‐Jacques Denis

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is twofold: to understand how recent developments in systems thinking and social construction can influence understanding of knowledge transfer (KT); and to propose a new systems‐based knowledge transfer model.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is a review of the literature on knowledge transfer, systems thinking and social construction leads to the proposal of a new KT paradigm.FindingsThe Dynamic Knowledge Transfer Capacity model (DKTC) found in this paper identifies the components required for social systems to generate, disseminate and use new knowledge to meet their needs. The model includes pre‐existing conditions, (need and prior knowledge) and four categories of capacities (generative, disseminative, absorptive and adaptive/responsive) that social systems must possess for KT to take place.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper shows that the DKTC model is particularly well suited to analyzing complex systems with multiple stakeholders as opposed to small‐scale knowledge transfer systems. Empirical analysis in complex systems environments will help verify, enrich and generalize the model.Practical implicationsThe paper sees that in an increasingly knowledge‐based economy, the ability to base decisions on the latest knowledge is vital for the success of organizations. The capacity for effective and sustained exchange between a system's stakeholders (researchers, government, practitioners, etc.); exchanges characterized by significant interactions reflected within the DKTC model, results in the appropriate use of the most recent discoveries in the decision making process.Originality/valueThe paper proposes a new knowledge transfer paradigm that views knowledge as a systemic, socially constructed, context‐specific representation of reality. The proposed knowledge transfer model is in sharp contrast to past attempts, focusing attention on the capacities that must be present in organizations and social systems as a precondition for knowledge transfer to occur.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management

Reference52 articles.

1. Ackoff, R.L. and Emery, F.E. (1972), On Purposeful Systems, Aldine Atherton, Chicago, IL.

2. Argote, L. (1999), Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge, Kluwer, Norwell, MA.

3. Argote, L., Ingram, P., Levine, J. and Moreland, R. (2000), “Knowledge transfer in organizations: learning from the experience of others”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 82 No. 1, pp. 1‐8.

4. Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T. (1966), The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge, Anchor Books, New York, NY.

5. Beyer, J.M. and Trice, H.M. (1982), “The utilization process: a conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 27, pp. 591‐622.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3