Author:
Svensson Ingrid,Löwstedt Martin
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to explore how a multitude of demands and challenges faced by public facilities management organizations’ (PFMOs) particularly in relation to a large building stock in need of measures’ are acted upon and negotiated in practice. Specifically this study asks: What are the institutional logics (IL) that constitute the organizational context of PFMOs? How does an institutional worker navigate to create change in PFMOs?
Design/methodology/approach
Data were collected through a case study of a public facility management organization and include interviews, a questionnaire, observations and organizational documents. The analytical focus is the work of a single actor, a project manager portrayed as “the navigator” and his institutional work (IW) of developing and implementing new organizational practices, to meet current challenges and develop a more “strategic” facility management.
Findings
The complex institutional landscape faced by officials in PFMOs enforce officials responsible for implementing and developing new practices to become navigators.
Originality/value
The findings offer a rich practice-based account of the day-to-day IW carried out by actors that try to navigate complex institutional landscapes, consisting of multiple and, at times, conflicting IL. Current challenges for PFMOs are to be portrayed as multi-dimensional and the actual work to transform organizational practices in this context is highly complex, unordered and messy. The findings point towards a need for new competences and roles to tackle current challenges; geared towards integrating different logics and perspectives.
Subject
Building and Construction,Architecture,Human Factors and Ergonomics
Reference64 articles.
1. Achieving strategic FM through strong relationship;Facilities,2000
2. Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency,2010
3. How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship;Academy of Management Annals,2009
4. A new professionalism: remedy or fantasy?;Building Research and Information,2013
5. Unintended consequences: institutional artefacts, closure mechanisms and the performance gap;Building Research and Information,2017
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献