Author:
O’Connell Sarah,Reynders Glenn,Seri Federico,Sterling Raymond,Keane Marcus M.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to standardised four-step flexibility assessment methodology for evaluating the available electrical load reduction or increase a building can provide in response to a signal from an aggregator or grid operator.
Design/methodology/approach
The four steps in the methodology consist of Step 1: systems, loads, storage and generation identification; Step 2: flexibility characterisation; Step 3: scenario modelling; and Step 4: key performance indicator (KPI) label.
Findings
A detailed case study for one building, validated through on-site experiments, verified the feasibility and accuracy of the approach.
Research limitations/implications
The results were benchmarked against available demonstration studies but could benefit from the future development of standardised benchmarks.
Practical implications
The ease of implementation enables building operators to quickly and cost effectively evaluate the flexibility of their building. By clearly defining the flexibility range, the KPI label enables contract negotiation between stakeholders for demand side services. It may also be applicable as a smart readiness indicator.
Social implications
The novel KPI label has the capability to operationalise the concept of building flexibility to a wider spectrum of society, enabling smart grid demand response roll-out to residential and small commercial customers.
Originality/value
This paper fulfils an identified need for an early stage flexibility assessment which explicitly includes source selection that can be implemented in an offline manner without the need for extensive real-time data acquisition, ICT platforms or additional metre and sensor installations.
Subject
Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference51 articles.
1. Defining and operationalising the concept of an energy positive neighbourhood,2015
2. Certification prerequisites for activities related to the trading of demand response resources;Energy,2015
3. Regulation as an enabler of demand response in electricity markets and power systems;Journal of Cleaner Production,2018
4. Baak, J. (2017), “Chapter 9 – bringing DER into the mainstream: regulations, innovation, and disruption on the grid’s edge”, in Sioshansi, F.P. (Ed.), Innovation and Disruption at the Grid’s Edge, Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp. 167-186.
5. Robust allocation of reserves considering different reserve types and the flexibility from HVDC;IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution,2017
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献