Construction project procurement routes: an in‐depth critique

Author:

Oyegoke Adekunle S.,Dickinson Michael,Khalfan Malik M.A.,McDermott Peter,Rowlinson Steve

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine different categories of building project procurement routes based on organisational, contractual, financial and technical issues.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is based on review of literature and conditions of contracts. The UK construction industry serves as a general frame of reference. The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors survey of Contracts in Use from 1985 to 2004 is used to probe the share and value of contracts along different procurement routes and across different conditions of contracts in the UK. The logic is that the value and the share of contracts will indicate the behaviour of different procurement routes in the UK construction market while the in‐depth analysis of conditions of contracts will show the gaps and relationships between the general definition/categorisation and contractual context (conditions of contracts) of each of the procurement routes.FindingsThe preliminary result of the analysis shows that traditional routes remain the main type of procurement route for the construction project industry sector, within which different management and incentivisation systems are applied for greater efficiency. The conditions of contracts in the UK support this assertion by aligning different procurement routes to different conditions of contracts and additionally specifying different forms of agreements, special provisions and incentivisation in order to increase performance, reduce risks and improve compensation methods.Research limitations/implicationsThe study can serve as a learning opportunity for construction project stakeholders internationally, and clients in particular, to differentiate between procurement routes, management‐oriented systems, relational contracting and incentivisation.Originality/valueThe research provides an original assessment of construction procurement which can be used as intervening tool in different levels of private and public procurement strategies.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Business and International Management

Reference34 articles.

1. Akintoye, A. (1994), “Design and build: a survey of construction contractors' views”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 155‐63.

2. Best, R. and Valence, G.D. (2002), Design and Construction Building in Value, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford.

3. Buljevich, E.C. and Park, Y.S. (1999), “Description of a project finance transaction”, Project Financing and the International Financial Markets, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.

4. Cornick, T. (1991), Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyor Investment Procurement and Performance in Construction, E & FN Spon, London.

5. Cox, D. (2001), “Private finance initiate‐an introduction to the structure and concepts of PFI”, Proceedings of 2001 of International Conference on Construction, Hong Kong, pp. 501‐12.

Cited by 52 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Dispute Avoidance in the Construction Industry: A Perspective of Procurement Methods;Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction;2024-08

2. Organisation Design in megaprojects: A systematic literature review and research agenda;International Journal of Project Management;2024-08

3. An Exploratory Study for Performance Improvement through Supplier Client Services Framework;International Journal of Applied Sciences & Development;2024-05-08

4. How optimal trust–dependence nexus facilitates relational behavior in contractor–subcontractor collaboration: a configurational analysis;Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management;2024-01-19

5. Exploring the Contractual Arrangements Associated with the Adoption of the Modern Methods of Construction in the United Kingdom;Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction;2023-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3