Author:
Malik Sumit,Sayin Eda,Jain Kriti
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to examine the effect of proximal (versus distant) depiction of food products within an advertising or online context on consumer responses across food types (indulgent versus non-indulgent) and display formats that lead to a single exposure (e.g. billboard) versus multiple exposures (e.g. online menu).
Design/methodology/approach
Five experimental studies, using both implicit and explicit elicitation techniques, demonstrate the effect of proximal food depictions. The paper rules out alternative explanations (portion-size perception and participants’ bodily distance) and controls for several other factors (e.g. visual crowding, body-mass index, dietary restrictions, etc.)
Findings
The studies find that proximal food pictures are implicitly associated with tastiness more for indulgent (vs non-indulgent) foods; lead to higher purchase intention for indulgent food upon a single exposure driven by enhanced perceived tastiness; and evoke satiation upon multiple exposures.
Research limitations/implications
This research identifies the effect of spatial proximity of food depiction on consumer responses using different stimuli. Future work could explore the effects in alternate consummatory contexts.
Practical implications
The findings provide clear instructions to marketers and policymakers on how to tailor consumer responses using spatial distance in depiction of food products, depending on the food type and display format. Understanding the effect of visual food cues will help policymakers devise strategies to counter over-consumption, which increases the risk of non-communicable diseases and reduces consumer well-being (SDG 3, United Nations).
Originality/value
Introducing a novel pictorial cue (i.e. the spatial distance of product depiction), this paper contributes insights to the literature on implicit associations, visual information processing, satiation, over-consumption and food marketing.
Reference64 articles.
1. Seeing and thinking in pictures: a review of visual information processing;Consumer Psychology Review,2019
2. Advertising Age Data Center (2020), “Leading national advertisers 2020 fact pack”, available at: https://s3-prod.adage.com/s3fs-public/2020-07/lnafp_aa_20200713_locked.pdf
3. Pleasure principles: a review of research on hedonic consumption;Journal of Consumer Psychology,2013
4. Assessing the role of contingency awareness in attitudinal conditioning with implications for advertising research;Journal of Marketing Research,1989
5. Distance-dependent processing of pictures and words;Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2009
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献