Abstract
PurposeThe main aim of this study is to investigate the role of fathers and mothers in the intergenerational educational persistence for sons and daughters under two dimensions that characterize the clusters of countries: redistributive policy and governance.Design/methodology/approachData from the Global Database of Intergenerational Mobility (GDIM), hierarchical cluster analysis on principal components and panel regression are used in this study to estimate intergenerational educational correlation and to investigate its determinants related to the parents’ and descendants’ education variables in 93 countries grouped in four clusters. The empirical analysis is differentiated by gender combinations of parents and descendants.FindingsIn the clusters of countries characterized by high inequalities and poor governance, our findings show that the role of the fathers is stronger than that of the mothers in educational transmission; fathers and mothers are more influential for the daughters rather than for the sons; parental educational privilege is the main driver of intergenerational educational persistence; there is an inverse U-curve in the association between educational inequality of the parents and educational correlation for the sons. Differently, in the countries characterized by high income, low redistributive conflict and better governance, the role of the mothers is stronger and education mobility for the daughters is higher than that for the sons.Social implicationsThe authors’ results remark on the importance of social welfare policies aimed to expand a meritocratic public education system including schooling transfers for lower social class students and narrowing the gender gap in educational mobility between daughters and sons. Social welfare policies should also be oriented to spread high quality child care systems that help to foster greater women equality in the labor market, because the strength of educational persistence depends on the position of the mother in the economic hierarchy.Originality/valueThe distinctiveness of the paper can be found in the fact that this study investigates the parental role differentiating by gender and coupling hierarchical cluster analysis on principal components with panel regression models. This allows us to have a sample of 93 countries aggregated in four groups defined in two dimensions: redistributive policy and governance. Amongst the determinants of educational transmission, we consider not only education’s years of the parents but also other determinants, such as educational inequality and privilege of the parents. We also identify the effects of investment in human capital and educational inequalities for the descendants on education mobility.
Reference34 articles.
1. An equilibrium theory of the distribution of income and intergenerational mobility;Journal of Political Economy,1979
2. Human capital and the rise and fall of families;Journal of Labor Economics,1986
3. Behrman, J.R. (2021), “Human capital and social mobility in low-and middle- income countries”, in Iversen, V., Krishna, A. and Sen, K. (Eds), Social Mobility in Developing Countries: Concepts, Methods, and Determinants, online edn, Oxford Academic, Oxford.
4. Welfare states and social mobility: how educational and social policy may affect cross-national differences in the association between occupational origins and destinations;Research in Social Stratification and Mobility,2006
5. Number of siblings and educational mobility;American Sociological Review,1985