Abstract
PurposeThis paper explores the characteristics and organisational attributes of hybrid non‐profit organisation (NPO)/public sector settings to identify the particular challenges presented for performance management and to further explore the extent to which such characteristics and attributes might impinge on a move to “performance governance” as a performance framework ideal type.Design/methodology/approachA preliminary case study of an Irish NPO/public sector hybrid organisation was used to ground a review of NPO and public sector performance management concepts and theoretical developments. The review focused on the implications of organisational characteristics/attributes of the hybrid case study organisation for performance management.FindingsFive organisational characteristics/attributes are identified as central to the understanding of the challenges for performance management in such settings: inter‐stakeholder relationships; tensions across priority objectives; culture and institutional clashes; power distribution; and interdependent stress. Further, it is suggested that while the adoption of collaborative public sector models suggests a move toward performance governance, the performance challenges identified in the hybrid setting give rise to particular barriers to any substantive movement in that direction.Originality/valuePerformance of NPO/public sector hybrid organisations has only relatively recently attracted the attention of researchers. The paper contributes to this emerging area by identifying certain organisational characteristics/attributes particular to such hybrids that are critical to understanding the challenges for performance management in such settings.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference46 articles.
1. Agranoff, R. (2005), “Managing collaborative performance: changing the boundaries of the state?”, Public Performance & Management Review, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 18‐45.
2. Agranoff, R. (2006), “Inside collaborative networks: ten lessons for public managers”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 66, December, special issue, pp. 56‐65.
3. Appleton, L. (2005), “The role of nonprofit organisations in the delivery of family services in 11 EU member and applicant states”, International Social Work, Vol. 48 No. 3, pp. 251‐62.
4. Bar‐Nir, D. and Gal, J. (2011), “Who has the power? The role of NPOs in public authorities”, Voluntas, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 1‐25.
5. Bouckaert, G. and Halligan, J. (2008), Managing Performance: International Comparisons, Routledge, Abingdon.
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献