Abstract
PurposeTo determine if there is confusion in governance terminology amongst experienced management and project management practitioners.Design/methodology/approachPractitioner interviews and subsequent analysis.FindingsSignificant differences in governance terminology were found. The participants had nevertheless arrived at similar operating arrangements for their committees, even though they came from different segments of different industries and did not agree on the definition of governance. It was possible to develop a list of working parameters for operation of these committees from their responses. The labelling of committees associated with governance as steering or decision-making was found to be problematic and various causes/motivations for the differing definitions of governance having arisen were detected. These ranged from altruism, through dogmatic belief in particular frameworks, to enhancing career prospects/ego.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample came from organisations and industries in one state in one country. The need for review of governance terminology used in various project management practitioner reference documents and methodologies was identified.Practical implicationsProjects and business alike can potentially achieve improvements in efficiency and effectiveness through consistency of terminology and the clarity this brings to governance arrangements and committee operations.Social implicationsCreation of a unifying feature within the project and management literature, shifting the understanding of governance and its boundaries and limitations. This will help progress governance from complexity to simplicity, from an art to an understandable practice, from a concept that has been hijacked for partisan and political gain to a lean social tool which can be put to use for the benefit of organisations, whether public, charitable or private.Originality/valueThe value is clarity – resulting in the avoidance of confusion and misunderstanding together with their consequent waste of time, resources and money.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Business and International Management
Reference41 articles.
1. What is project governance and what are its origins?;International Journal of Project Management,2014
2. A review of health governance: definitions, dimensions and tools to govern;Health Policy,2014
3. Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper;Journal of Advanced Nursing,1994
4. Multi-level project governance: trends and opportunities;International Journal of Project Management,2014
5. Cepiku, D. (2013), “Unraveling the concept of public governance: a literature review of different traditions”, in Gnan, L., Hinna, A. and Monteduro, F. (Eds), Conceptualizing and Researching Governance in Public and Non-profit Organizations.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Support from Governance, Leadership and Smart People in the context of Smart Cities Development;2022 IEEE 28th International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) & 31st International Association For Management of Technology (IAMOT) Joint Conference;2022-06-19
2. Passionate projects: practitioner reflections on emotion management;International Journal of Managing Projects in Business;2022-05-10
3. Development of a Theory of Meaning for Conceptual Terms;Speaking Management;2021
4. Philosophical Examination of the Ten Linguistic Traps/Issues;Speaking Management;2021
5. Governance;Speaking Management;2021