Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to measure reliability and validity of the Scoring Rubric for Information Literacy (Van Helvoort, 2010).
Design/methodology/approach
Percentages of agreement and Intraclass Correlation were used to describe interrater reliability. For the determination of construct validity factor analysis and reliability analysis were used. Criterion validity was calculated with Pearson correlations.
Findings
In the described case, the Scoring Rubric for Information Literacy appears to be a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of information literate performance.
Originality/value
Reliability and validity are prerequisites to recommend a rubric for application. The results confirm that this Scoring Rubric for Information Literacy can be used in courses in higher education, not only for assessment purposes but also to foster learning.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference27 articles.
1. The application of reliability and validity measures to assess the effectiveness of an undergraduate citation rubric;Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian,2015
2. Belanger, J., Zou, N., Mills, J., Holmes, C. and Oakleaf, M. (2015), “Project RAILS: lessons learned about rubric assessment of information literacy skills”, Portal: Libraries and the Academy, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 623-644.
3. Information problem solving by experts and novices: analysis of a complex cognitive skill;Computers in Human Behavior,2005
4. Examining design and inter-rater reliability of a rubric measuring research quality across multiple disciplines;Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation,2009
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献