Risk and desistance factors for female acquisitive offending: a systematic review

Author:

Ihsan-Ghafoor Faiza,Worthington Rachel,Coughlin Louise

Abstract

Purpose This systematic review sought to examine the research body on acquisitive offending among female offenders, specifically exploring what factors may take females closer towards engaging in acquisitive offending and what factors may support desistance from this behaviour. Design/methodology/approach A systematic review was conducted, using the recommended guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. A total of 8,129 initial articles were identified from the search terms, 77 articles were deemed suitable to meet the inclusion criteria and are explored in the results section. Papers were screened for quality appraisal and risk of bias. Findings Ten factors were identified that took females closer towards offending. Five factors were identified that took females away from offending. Based on the findings, four typologies of female acquisitive offenders were identified: short-term orientation (adolescent); mental health orientation; life-course persistent (theft); and acquisitive diversity (including robbery and burglary). Research limitations/implications Future research would benefit from exploring a more rich understanding of the mechanisms that underpin why females engage in acquisitive offending and what factors contribute towards their desistance. A wider range of bio-psycho-social factors, which may increase the risk of acquisitive offending, should also be considered in future research alongside ways in which interventions may be gender-responsive. Originality/value This review provides insight into the differing functions and typologies of female acquisitive offending. Interventions for each of these typologies are considered within the review.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference26 articles.

1. Strain theories;Agnew and Scheuerman,2015

2. Barends, E., Rousseau, D.M. and Briner, R.B. (2014), “Evidence-based management: the basic principles”, Amsterdam: Centre for Evidence-Based Management, available at: www.cebma.org/wp-content/uploads/Evidence-Based-Practice-The-Basic-Principles

3. Prove me the bam!’: victimization and agency in the lives of young women who commit violent offences;Probation Journal,2005

4. Desistance from and persistence in male offending: the case of South Korea;International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice,2018

5. Pathways between types of crime and criminal social identity: a network approach;Journal of Criminal Justice,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3