A framework of image use among archaeologists, architects, art historians and artists

Author:

E. Beaudoin Joan

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report on a research study which examined how and why images were used by professional image users to inform the design and development of information systems and services. Design/methodology/approach – A total of 20 participants in four user groups, archaeologist, architect, art historian and artist, took part in this qualitative research study. Data was collected through a survey and one-on-one semi-structured interview and data analysis was completed using case-ordered displays and the constant comparative method. Findings – The findings revealed that image use varied according to profession. Archaeologists and art historians identified using images within their lecture presentations, and for research and publications. While architects and artists noted using images for research and design creation, their work products differed. Several reasons why these professionals used images in their work were identified: knowledge, conceptual model, inspiration, cognitive recall, critical thinking, emotion, engagement, marketing, proof, social connection, translation, and trust. Research limitations/implications – Study limitations include the small number of user groups, and methods dependent on participants' abilities to recall and clearly articulate past activities. Originality/value – The study clarifies the varied roles visual information plays in the work of archaeologists, architects, art historians and artists. As the paper reveals how and why images are used, its contents are particularly useful for systems designers, librarians and other individuals who support image users.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference44 articles.

1. Bakewell, E. , Beeman, W. , Reese, C. and Schmitt, M. (Ed.) (1988), Object, Image, Inquiry: The Art Historian at Work, Getty Art History Information Program, Santa Monica, CA.

2. Bates, M. (1998), “Indexing and access for digital libraries and the internet: database and domain factors”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 49 No. 13, pp. 1185-1205.

3. Beaudoin, J.E. (2009), “An investigation of image users across professions: a framework of their image needs, retrieval and use”, Doctoral dissertation, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, available at: http://idea.library.drexel.edu/bitstream/1860/3160/1/Beaudoin_Joan.pdf (accessed 27 August 2012).

4. Bradfield, V. (1976), Slide Collections: A User Requirements Survey, Leicester Polytechnic, Leicester, British Library Research & Development Report 5309.

5. Brilliant, R. (1988), “How an art historian connects art objects and information”, Library Trends, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 120-129.

Cited by 29 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3