Creating cross-functional strategic consensus in manufacturing facilities

Author:

L. Rosado Feger Ana

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to propose and tests a model that plant managers can use to develop cross-functional strategic consensus between purchasing, production, and logistics. The mechanisms studied are grounded in Organizational Information Processing Theory. Design/methodology/approach – The model is tested using a cross-sectional survey of 120 manufacturing facilities. Path Analysis is used to determine the strength of the relationships and the model fit. Findings – The mechanisms studied have a positive effect on the level of cross-functional strategic consensus. Some mechanisms have an effect on consensus on goals, while others have an effect on consensus on priorities. The results suggest that a plant manager must implement these mechanisms in combination to achieve the best result. Research limitations/implications – The survey respondents are all from US manufacturing facilities. Although reasonably representative of the US population of manufacturing firms, results of a similar study in other countries would further refine the knowledge concerning the effects of the mechanisms on developing strategic consensus at the operating level. Practical implications – The results of this paper provide plant managers with guidance regarding the mechanisms that can enhance cross-functional strategic consensus. In a hypercompetitive and dynamic environment, these mechanisms can help the Plant Manager create a streamlined and efficient operation. Originality/value – This paper presents practitioners with mechanisms that can promote consensus between key supply chain departments. The results highlight the need to implement combinations of mechanisms in order to address both dimensions of strategic consensus. For academics, it provides an empirical test of antecedents to strategic consensus at the operational level.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences

Reference103 articles.

1. Anderson, J. and Gerbing, D. (1991), “Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76 No. 5, pp. 732-740.

2. Atwater, D. and Bass, B. (1994), “Transformational leadership in teams”, in Bass, B. and Avolio, B. (Eds), Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership, Sage Publications, London, pp. 48-83.

3. Barnard, C. (1968), The Functions of the Executive, 30th Anniversary Edition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

4. Bass, B.M. (1981), Bass and Stodghill's Handbook of Leadership, Free Press, New York, NY.

5. Bass, B.M. (1985), “Leadership – good, better, best”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 28-40.

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3