The nature and development of liminality competence

Author:

Borg Elisabeth,Soderlund Jonas

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to present findings from an interpretative study documenting how mobile project workers develop their conceptions of work performed in liminal (in-between) positions. The overall purpose of the paper is to elucidate how people in time-limited and ambiguous work positions develop competences to manage their dynamic work conditions. Design/methodology/approach – This research relies on two narratives of mobile project workers drawn from a larger longitudinal study. The empirical material includes diaries and multiple interviews. The analysis takes a narrative approach and identifies how and when the mobile project workers enhance their level of liminality competence. Findings – Three processes were identified as significant in developing higher liminality competence: understanding the value of in-betweenness, embracing the role as an inside-outsider and translating the liminal experience through reflexivity. Practical implications – The paper demonstrates the need for employers to support individuals in passing through the three processes and to support thoughtful mobility across different project settings to improve the liminality competence of their employees. Originality/value – In the dual ambition of offering insights based on interpretative research on competence and putting greater emphasis on people working in in-between positions, this study enhances the understanding of how individuals develop their conceptions of work in general, and their conceptions of liminality at work in particular.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Development,Social Psychology

Reference36 articles.

1. Arthur, M.B. and Rousseau, D.M. (1996), “A career lexicon for the 21st century”, Academy of Management Executive , Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 28-39.

2. Barley, S.R. and Kunda, G. (2004), Gurus, Hired Guns, and Warm Bodies: Itinerant Experts in a Knowlege Economy , Princeton University Press, Princeton.

3. Barley, S.R. and Kunda, G. (2006), “Contracting: a new form of professional practice”, Academy of Management Perspectives , Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 45-66.

4. Beech, N. (2011), “Liminality and the practices of identity reconstruction”, Human Relations , Vol. 64 No. 2, pp. 285-302.

5. Bolger, N. , Davis, A. and Rafaeli, E. (2003), “Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived”, Annual Review of Psychology , Vol. 54 No. 1, p. 579.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3