An exploration of logistics-related customer service provision on Twitter

Author:

Bhattacharjya Jyotirmoyee,Ellison Adrian,Tripathi Sonali

Abstract

Purpose – The success of e-retailers is intrinsically linked to the effectiveness of their logistics processes which, inevitably, involve third party service providers. As the most tangible representative of the e-retailers it is inevitable that customers expect the e-retailer to resolve delivery queries, including on social media platforms. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effectiveness of e-retailers’ logistics-related customer service interactions on Twitter with a view towards identifying effective and ineffective social media customer service strategies. Design/methodology/approach – The design and public nature of Twitter encourages organic conversations between e-retailers and customers as well as between customers and other customers. The methodology applied here accounts for this by collecting and analysing interactions within and as part of conversations, not as independent observations. In total, 203,349 tweets were collected from 22 of the most popular e-retailers. A random sample of 5,000 logistics-related conversations (16,998 tweets) is used for the analysis presented here and forms a foundation for future research. Findings – Conversations are initiated by customers on the basis of 24 event triggers which can be categorised as occurring either before or after an order is delivered. These can be general queries or related to a specific order or delivery issue. The paper identifies a number of significant findings such as the extent to which e-retailers and logistics providers redirect customers to other channels to resolve queries, ignoring the implicit preference by customers to use Twitter to resolve their problem. Similarly, the lack of interactions between e-retailers and their logistics providers within the Twitter platform to help resolve customer queries results in ineffective customer service. Practical implications – The study identifies the way in which e-retailers can substantially improve the effectiveness of the customer service they provide on Twitter by ensuring that customer queries can be resolved within the platform and by working with their logistics partners to do the same. This is critical since problems may be directed to the e-retailer or the logistics provider but both companies jointly suffer the consequences of poor customer service. Originality/value – The study examines a hitherto underexplored aspect of retail logistics – the social media-based customer service activities of e-retailers. Methodologically, the study is rooted in the acknowledgement that interactions on Twitter form conversations and analyses should take this into account. This is a distinctly different approach from existing Twitter-related studies which conduct an automated sentiment analysis of tweets. This approach reveals a rich picture of interactions and, importantly, identifies where conversations between e-retailers begin, how they develop and how they conclude.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Transportation

Reference64 articles.

1. Alhabash, S. , Chiang, Y.-H. and Huang, K. (2014), “MAM & U & G in Taiwan: differences in the uses and gratifications of Facebook as a function of motivational reactivity”, Computers in Human Behaviour , Vol. 35, pp. 423-430.

2. Andriole, S.J. (2012), “Seven indisputable technology trends that will define 2015”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems , Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 61-72.

3. Baird, C.H. and Parasnis, G. (2011), “From social media to social customer relationship management”, Strategy & Leadership , Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 30-37.

4. Bell, D.R. , Gallino, S. and Moreno, A. (2014), “How to win in an omnichannel world how to win in an omnichannel world”, MIT Sloan Management Review , Vol. 56 No. 1, pp. 45-53.

5. Ben-Shabat, H. , Moriarty, M. , Nilforoushan, P. and Yuen, C. (2015), “The 2015 global retail e-commerce index: global retail keeps on clicking”, Chicago, IL, available at: www.atkearney.com.au/documents/10192/5691153/Global+Retail+E-Commerce+Keeps+On+Clicking.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3