Human capital analytics: too much data and analysis, not enough models and business insights

Author:

Levenson Alec,Fink Alexis

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to address the barriers to the rapid development of effective HR analytics capabilities in organizations. Design/methodology/approach Literature and conceptual review of the current state of HR analytics. Findings “HR analytics” is used to refer to a too-wide array of measurement and analytical approaches, making strategic focus difficult. There is a misconception that doing more measurement of HR activities and human capital will necessarily lead to actionable insights. There is too much focus on incremental improvement of existing HR processes, detracting from diagnosing the problems with business performance. Too much time is spent on mining existing data, to the detriment of model building and testing, including collecting new more appropriate data. Too much energy is consumed with basic tasks of data management. Stakeholders avoid action by nitpicking the details of the data. Practical implications Practitioners who follow the guidance provided should find that their application of HR analytics leads to more relevant and actionable insights. Social implications More effective application of HR analytics should lead to better decision making in organizations and more effective resource allocation. Originality/value A new look at the field of HR analytics that synthesizes the research literature and current practice in organizations.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Reference60 articles.

1. Balkundi, P. and Harrison, D.A. (2006), “Ties, leaders, and time in teams: strong inference about network structure’s effects on team viability and performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 49-68.

2. Boudreau, J.W. (1991), “Utility analysis for decisions in human resource management”, in Dunnette, M.D. and Hough, L.M. (Eds), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 621-745.

Cited by 61 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3