Abstract
This paper examines three key factors that help to explain the differences between high and low performing plants in process quality. The three factors are: first, the seniority of manufacturing personnel within the plants; second, the involvement of these senior managers in the business, rather than being confined to the role of a production/technology functional specialist; third, the contribution of a manufacturing strategy which includes quality as part of its content and which feeds into, and forms part of, the overall business plan within the plant. The paper argues that these three factors help to maintain the strategic importance of quality and, consequently, help to explain the subsequent quality performance within the manufacturing plant. The conclusions are that two distinct groups emerge ‐ one, Traditional, and the other, Enlightened ‐ which are different in terms of attitudes, commitment to, and capabilities in, quality.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference78 articles.
1. Adler, P. (1993), “Time and motion regained”, Harvard Business Review, January‐February..
2. Ahire, S. and Waller, M. (1994), “Incremental and breakthrough improvement: an integrative framework”, International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 19‐32.
3. Ahire, S., Landeros, R. and Golhar, D. (1995), “Total quality management: a literature review and an agenda for future research”, Production and Operations Management, Vol. 4 No. 3, Summer.
4. Anderson, J., Schroeder, R. and Cleveland, G. (1991), “The process of manufacturing strategy: some empirical observations and conclusions”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 86‐110.
5. Bessant, J. (1991), Managing Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Blackwell, Oxford.
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献