Abstract
PurposeThe “public interest” of financial institutions was used as an argument to intervene in accounting practices. The Bank of Spain's standard was not compatible with International Accounting Standard (henceforth IAS) 39 and the Spanish banking sector had become one of the most provisioned in Europe. This makes it an interesting case study of the relationship between provisioning and income smoothing. The 2008 financial crisis revealed that provisions were insufficient and a reinforcement regulation process began in 2012. This paper aims to examine whether, since 2012, the Bank of Spain's regulatory effort on impairment accounting standards has induced less income smoothing, correcting its countercyclical effect.Design/methodology/approachA regression model is applied during the period 2005–2020, to test whether there is a trend change in the correlation between the level of provisions and annual earnings in 2012.FindingsThe results show that from 2012 onwards (when the Bank of Spain reinforced the regulation on provisioning), there was a correction in income smoothing behaviour.Originality/valueThis study provides empirical evidence that reinforces the claim that accounting policy can affect decision-making accounting practices, in this particular case, at the Bank of Spain.
Reference84 articles.
1. The procyclicality of expected credit loss provisions,2018
2. Banks’ financial reporting and financial system stability;Journal of Accounting Research,2016
3. Loan loss provisioning rules, procyclicality, and financial volatility;Journal of Banking and Finance,2015
4. The influence of macroeconomic developments on Austrian banks: implications for banking supervision,2001
5. Nonlinear dynamics in discretionary accruals: an analysis of bank loan-loss provisions;Journal of Banking and Finance,2013