The impact of design decisions on post occupancy processes in school buildings

Author:

Adeyeye Kemi,Piroozfar Poorang,Rosenkind Micah,Winstanley Graham,Pegg Ian

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to review the impact of design and specification decisions for major works during post‐occupancy processes; the routine maintenance and management of school premises. It also seeks to explore the relationship between the main stakeholders and how this impacts decision‐making and the post‐occupancy operation of school buildings.Design/methodology/approachIn addition to a literature review, qualitative data were also obtained through a focus group; a steering group. The steering group consisted of stakeholders tasked with delivering and managing school premises in the Sussex County.FindingsThe findings contribute to understanding the impact of design decisions on post‐occupancy processes in schools. A basic model is also presented as a guide for requirements and decision mapping in post‐occupancy design decision processes in schools.Research limitations/implicationsThe study was conducted with the participation of a representative sample of stakeholders. There may be the need to investigate the issues further in a localised context before detailed solutions are proposed.Practical implicationsThe paper reports findings based on the needs, requirements, and preferences of the stakeholders as well as the opportunities and constraints to improving the quality of design processes which in turn will improve post occupancy processes.Originality/valueThe paper highlights the complexity of design decision‐making in schools, presents the viewpoint of stakeholders, and proposes a basic model to ensure performance for post‐occupancy processes to inform the next stage of the research.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Building and Construction,Architecture,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Reference38 articles.

1. Addy, N. (2004), “Planning the path to best value”, Workshop Report E4135, Construction Productivity Network, CIRIA, London.

2. Bertelsen, S. and Emmitt, S. (2005), “The client as a complex system”, Proceedings of the IGLC‐13 Conference, July, Sydney.

3. Björk, B.C. (1999), “Information technology in construction: domain definition and research issues”, International Journal of Computer Integrated Design and Construction, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 3‐16.

4. Bordass, B. and Leaman, A. (2005), “Making feedback and post‐occupancy evaluation routine 1: a portfolio of feedback techniques”, Building Research & Information, Vol. 33 No. 4, p. 347.

5. Bouchlaghem, D., Kimmance, A.G. and Anumba, C.J. (2004), “Integrating product and process information in the construction sector”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 104 No. 3, pp. 218‐33.

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3