Universities’ contributions to social innovation: reflections in theory & practice

Author:

Benneworth Paul,Cunha Jorge

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to resolve a tension in understanding how universities contribute to knowledge-based urban development (KBUD). Design/methodology/approach – The paper is a conceptual paper, which analyses the tension as emerging between the university and the wider societal activity. The paper creates a framework for combining insights from both those theoretical frameworks to better understand why universities might choose to contribute to KBUD. Findings – The paper argues that it is important to understand the benefits that the universities get from participating in the KBUD. This can be through the unique tacit knowledge that emerges in the social innovation process, but their might also be value for the university in terms of two other variables, material resources and symbolic legitimacy. Research limitations/implications – The paper is a literature review and therefore is limited to raising a series of future questions and directions for research in the field, as well as to providing a lens and context for existing work. Practical implications – There are clear implications for those seeking to improve universities contributions to KBUD. It is not merely enough for strategic leaders to come together and agree that promoting the university will promote KBUD: it is necessary to modify a range of processes within the university to ensure that a wide range of actors are able to benefit from participating in KBUD activities, and that it facilitates their own teaching and research activities. Social implications – For universities to make a substantive contribution to promoting KBUD, policy-makers must ensure that they do not create disincentives through universities’ teaching and research activities. Originality/value – This is the first time that a paper has sought to bridge between theories of urban development and social innovation, and universities’ internal institutional and organisational dynamics.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation

Reference85 articles.

1. Adams, D. and Hess, M. (2008), “Social innovation as a new public administration strategy”, Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management, Brisbane, , 26-28 March, pp. 1-8, available at: www.irspm2008.bus.qut.edu.au/papers/documents/pdf/Hess & Adams-SocialinnovationasanewPublicAdministrationStrategy-IRSPM2008.pdf (accessed 28 March 2013).

2. Andrew, C. and Klein, J.-K. (2010), “Social innovation: what is it and why is it important to understand it better”, Collection Études théoriques (ET1003) , CRISES.

3. Bacon, N. , Faizullah, N. , Mulgan, G. and Woodcraft, S. (2008), Transformers: How Local Areas Innovate To Address Changing Social Needs , NESTA, London.

4. Battenburg, J.R. (1981), “Forging links between industry and the academic world”, Journal of the Society of Research Administrators , Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 5-11.

5. Benneworth, P. (2013), University Engagement With Socially Excluded Communities , Springer, Dordrecht.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3