Leadership for learning: lessons from 40 years of empirical research

Author:

Hallinger Philip

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to present a research‐based model of leadership for learning. It argues that the field has made substantial progress over the past 40 years in identifying ways in which leadership contributes to learning and school improvement. Four specific dimensions of leading for learning are presented: values and beliefs, leadership focus, contexts for leadership, and sharing leadership.Design/methodology/approachThe paper employs a review methodology but focuses especially on evidence from several recent empirical studies. While the author argues that progress has been made, limitations – especially with respect to linking leadership practice to different contexts – are noted.FindingsThe paper finds that significant progress has been made in identifying the means by which leadership impacts on learning.Research limitations/implicationsThe key limitation in this research lies in the difficulty in linking leadership to its context. While progress is also beginning to be made in this area, it remains a limiting factor in interpreting the findings from this body of research.Practical implicationsThe above limitation means that individual school leaders must still apply the findings both with caution and with an understanding of their own particular school context.Originality/valueThe paper extends prior reviews by its inclusion of findings from a series of important studies that have emerged since 2008.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Administration,Education

Reference80 articles.

1. Barth, R. (1986), “On sheep and goats and school reform”, Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 68 No. 4, pp. 293‐6.

2. Barth, R. (1990), Improving Schools from Within, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.

3. Bass, B. (1990), Bass and Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership, 3rd ed., The Free Press, New York, NY.

4. Bell, L., Bolam, R. and Cubillo, L. (2003), A Systematic Review of the Impact of School Headteachers and Principals on Student Outcomes, EPPI‐Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, London.

5. Bossert, S., Dwyer, D., Rowan, B. and Lee, G. (1982), “The instructional management role of the principal”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 34‐64.

Cited by 483 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3