Developing scientifically validated bias and diversity trainings that work: empowering agents of change to reduce bias, create inclusion, and promote equity

Author:

Cox William Taylor LaimakaORCID

Abstract

PurposeResearch consistently shows that non-scientific bias, equity, and diversity trainings do not work, and often make bias and diversity problems worse. Despite these widespread failures, there is considerable reason for hope that effective, meaningful DEI efforts can be developed. One approach in particular, the bias habit-breaking training, has 15 years of experimental evidence demonstrating its widespread effectiveness and efficacy.Design/methodology/approachThis article discusses bias, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts from the author’s perspective as a scientist–practitioner – the author draws primarily on the scientific literature, but also integrates insights from practical experiences working in DEI. The author provides a roadmap for adapting effective, evidence-based approaches from other disciplines (e.g. cognitive-behavioral therapy) into the DEI context and review evidence related to the bias habit-breaking training, as one prominent demonstration of a scientifically-validated approach that effects lasting, meaningful improvements on DEI issues within both individuals and institutions.FindingsDEI trainings fail due to widespread adoption of the information deficit model, which is well-known as a highly ineffective approach. Empowerment-based approaches, in contrast, are highly promising for making meaningful, lasting changes in the DEI realm. Evidence indicates that the bias habit-breaking training is effective at empowering individuals as agents of change to reduce bias, create inclusion, and promote equity, both within themselves and the social contexts they inhabit.Originality/valueIn contrast to the considerable despair and pessimism around DEI efforts, the present analysis provides hope and optimism, and an empirically-validated path forward, to develop and test DEI approaches that empower individuals as agents of change.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference150 articles.

1. Diversity-related training: what is it good for?;Heterodox: The Blog,2020

2. A dynamic model of guilt: implications for motivation and self-regulation in the context of prejudice;Psychological Science,2007

3. Seeing race and seeming racist? Evaluating strategic colorblindness in social interaction;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2008

4. Racial colorblindness: emergence, practice, and implications;Current Directions in Psychological Science,2012

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Remote Data Collection of Infant Activity and Sleep Patterns via Wearable Sensors in the HEALthy Brain and Child Development Study (HBCD);Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience;2024-09

2. Recognising and managing bias and prejudice in healthcare;BJA Education;2024-07

3. Perspective Chapter: Harnessing the Potential of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) in Health – The Need for an Intersectional Approach;Bridging Social Inequality Gaps - Concepts, Theories, Methods, and Tools [Working Title];2024-06-24

4. Fostering Diversity and Inclusion for Global Talent Acquisition and Retention;Advances in Human Resources Management and Organizational Development;2024-06-03

5. Leading and Learning in Inhospitable Terrain;Advances in Educational Marketing, Administration, and Leadership;2024-05-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3