The funding effect on citation and social attention: the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a case study

Author:

Dorta-González PabloORCID,Dorta-González María Isabel

Abstract

PurposeAcademic citation and social attention measure different dimensions in the impact of research results. The authors quantify the contribution of funding to both indicators considering the differences attributable to the research field and access type.Design/methodology/approachCitation and social attention accumulated until the year 2021 of more than 367 thousand research articles published in the year 2018 are studied. The authors consider funding acknowledgments (FAs) in the research articles. The data source is Dimensions, and the units of study are research articles in the United Nation (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).FindingsMost cited goals by researchers do not coincide with those that arouse greater social attention. A small proportion of articles accumulates a large part of the citations and most of the social attention. Both citation and social attention grow with funding. Thus, funded research has a greater probability of being cited in academic articles and mentioned in social media. Funded research receives on average two to three times more citations and 2.5 to 4.5 times more social attention than unfunded research. Moreover, the open access (OA) modalities gold and hybrid have the greatest advantages in citation and social attention due to funding.Research limitations/implicationsSpecific topics were studied in a specific period. Studying other topics and/or different time periods might result in different findings.Practical implicationsWhen funding to publish in open or hybrid access journals is not available, it is advisable to self-archiving the pre-print or post-print version in a freely accessible repository.Social implicationsAlthough cautiously, it is also advisable to consider the social impact of the research to complement the scientific impact in the evaluation of the research.Originality/valueThe joint evaluation of the effect of both funding and OA on social attention.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems

Reference55 articles.

1. Concentration or dispersal of research funding?;Quantitative Science Studies,2020

2. Altmetric (2021), “How is the altmetric attention score calculated?”, 25 April 2022, available at: https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000233311-how-is-the-altmetric-attention-score-calculated-

3. Funding acknowledgements in scientific publications: a literature review;Research Evaluation,2020

4. The important thing is not to win, it is to take part: what if scientists benefit from participating in research grant competitions?;Research Policy,2019

5. Disciplinary variations in altmetric coverage of scholarly articles,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3